Just Harvest | Home


Main Menu
About Just Harvest What We Do Our Publications About Hunger and Poverty How You Can Help Take Action! Links Just Harvest Home


Just Harvest News

A PUBLICATION OF THE JUST HARVEST EDUCATION FUND


March-April 2005- Volume 19 No. 2

Click HERE to review our previous newsletter.

FRONT PAGE NEWS


STATE NEWS:
NEWS BRIEFS:
OTHER NEWS
  • Pennsylvania Loses Three Important Leaders
  • What's For Lunch?
  • Victory In Promotion of the Food Stamp Program In Allegheny County!
  • Thank You!
  • Major Changes In Store for Welfare: Talk to Your Congressperson Now!
  • What is Budget Reconciliation and Why Should You Care?
    ANNOUNCEMENTS
  • Have a Party and Spread the Word
  • Wellstone Documentary Screening to Benefit Just Harvest
  • Just Harvest Now Accepts Donations Online


    Come to a Mayoral Forum

    (all the Pittsburgh candidates have been invited)
    Hear them tell us how they will attack hunger and poverty in our city

    TUESDAY, MAY 3
    JUST HARVEST ANNUAL MEETING - 7PM
    MAYORAL FORUM - 7:30

    First Baptist Church – Bellefield and Bayard- 7 pm
    Dinner at 6 pm - Donation requested and RSVP is required
    Call 431-8960 for more info and to RSVP

    Federal Budget Threatens Disaster- Advocates Respond

    Pres. Bush’s proposed budget is a political document not a real budget document. It offers no deficit reduction and no details about the 150 programs he wants to cut. The big ticket items --- the war, homeland security, excessive tax cuts for wealthy people, and Social Security—are not even on the table.

    The budget would pass the buck to the states. It will cost Pennsylvania $3 million in federal grants over 5 years. More than 20,000 fewer women and children who receive WIC benefits, 10,000 child care participants, 4,000 Head Start students, and 32,200 emergency energy (LIHEAP) users will lose their benefits.

    The implications for poor and moderate-income people are disastrous. Millions of children, low-moderate wage workers, elderly and people with disabilities will suffer senselessly. Possible caps to entitlements will lead to large cuts in future years. This year deep’ appropriations could make deep cuts in discretionary programs like WIC, housing, Head Start, K-12 education, child care, veterans medical care.

    Although Bush doesn’t propose immediate cuts in child nutrition programs, the 5-year commitment of his party to “restraining spending,”and “keeping entitlements from growing out of control” is frightening.

    Pittsburgh was one of the first cities to hold a rally opposing Bush's budget.—on Feb. 7, the day the budget was announced. Over 100 people came and each speaker told of her/his own circumstances and how cuts would hurt them and their families.Veterans, single moms, people with disabilities, and public housing residents told their stories. The Pittsburgh Post Gazette was the first major paper to editorialize: "Poor Priorities" was its lead editorial the next day.

    Discussions have begun in Congress and the process is expected to move quickly. Several Republican Senators have opposed Bush’s proposal because it doesn’t go far enough and want to attach reconciliation instructions that would cut entitlements.

    That is why we must fight against any budget resolution which includes reconciliation.

    Following a two-day conference last month at the Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) in Washington, a Pennsylvania delegation -- including two Just Harvest staffers -- joined several hundred others for intensive lobbying on the Hill. Our delegation visited staffers of Sens. Specter(R) and Santorum(R), Reps. English(R), Murphy(R), and Murtha(D). Reps. Hart(R) and Doyle(D) also met with us. Although they were non-committal, among the Republicans there was strong opposition to rescinding the tax cuts for the wealthy, even though this is one of the best ways to reduce the deficit. (Federal revenues are at an all-time low, now – all federal revenues are the lowest since 1959, and federal individual income tax revenues are the lowest since 1951!) It’s important that you act immediately.

    ACTION. Call/write/fax/visit your Congressperson and Senators about the federal budget. Tell them to a)oppose budget cuts in programs that serve low-income people; b)oppose structural changes such as entitlement caps or block grants; c)oppose a budget resolution that includes reconciliation; d)ensure full funding and expansions to programs for vulnerable people. Call Just Harvest for more information or to get involved in other activities.

    LEARN MORE AT THESE WEBSITES:

    • CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORITIES, WWW.CBPP.ORG
    • COALITION ON HUMAN NEEDS, WWW.CHN.ORG
    • CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE, WWW.COMMUNITYCHANGE.ORG
    • FOOD RESEARCH AND ACTION CENTER, WWW.FRAC.ORG
    • NATIONAL PRIORITIES PROJECT, WWW.NATIONALPRIORITIES.ORG
    • UNITED FOR A FAIR ECONOMY, WWW.FAIRECONOMY.ORG
    • FAIR TAXES FOR ALL, WWW.FAIRTAXES4ALL.ORG
    • PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN, WWW.PAPARTNERSHIPS.ORG.

      Thanks to Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Coalition on Human Needs, Center for Community Change and PA Partnerships for Children for help with this article. (loyd, the thanks is part of the article)

      Back to TOP

      Perspective: TO PRIVATIZE SOCIAL SECURITY OR NOT


      by Mary Elizabeth McCarthy

      Across the country, and particularly in the hallowed halls of Congress, a debate is occurring. At the heart of it lies a discussion with philosophical underpinnings which can be traced back to the foundation of our country. There is the Rugged Individualism vs. an Agreement to Band Together. This began in 1620 when the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. Facing a hostile environment the Pilgrims saw themselves as each man for himself. Yet, they adopted the Mayflower Compact which set rules of law designed to band the Pilgrims together, not only legally but also socially.

      Fast forward to the years from 1932-1945. The Great Depression, FDR was elected, the law known as Social Security passed in 1936 to lift the elderly out of poverty, providing for widows and orphans, and World War II occurred. In the space of 12 short years Americans came together as never before. There was a collective spirit that lifted America to the decades of unprecedented prosperity, which permitted the disabled to be covered under Social Security in 1956 through the leadership of Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson.

      But now Rugged Individualism is reemerging. Details, though not all, have been surfacing since President Bush's State of the Union speech on Jan.27, 2005. Privatization has been touted as saving Social Security from certain bankruptcy in 2042. Never mind that most respected economists of both parties dismiss this as distorted rhetoric. The debate is being couched in a divisive appeal to certain groups. There seems to be a generational component to this debate, as well as a racial one. Young people are being told that by the time they reach retirement age the system will be "flat broke." Grandparents, as well as parents, are being taken on perhaps the greatest guilt trip of all. And the young are asked to imagine "their golden years" laced with dire poverty, if these personal accounts are not enacted.

      President Bush met with African-American leaders in late January. The President related that statistics show that blacks die younger than white Americans. Therefore, their surviving widows and dependent children will inherit their personal accounts, presumably benefiting their wallets. .How this will occur is not spelled out. And many do not know that the SS benefits that will accompany their savings will not be configured on the years people work, but on the inflation rate. But the question of why the disparity of mortality between black and white Americans is not addressed.

      Many are saying that this plan will not be adopted. But one only has to look at the Medicare Prescription Bill enacted in Nov of 2003. It was conceived behind closed doors by the Republican leadership and debated briefly. The vote was left open 3 hours longer than normal. It passed rapidly without time to digest its entirety, overlooking the rising prices of prescriptions - thus hurting seniors.

      Sen. Rick Santorum faced angry citizens in Pittsburgh at the first of his round of community meetings in January. Proponents seem to be facing increasing opposition to this plan.

      Back to TOP

      Governor’s Budget Would Cut Emergency Food Money by $2.5 Million

      Food bankers and food program managers reacted sharply to the Rendell Administration’s plan to cut $2.4 million from the State’s emergency food program. The cut – if adopted by the General Assembly – would reduce the state-funded food supply by over 14 %!

      “This would mean a cut of $205,273 from our Pittsburgh Food Bank—nearly a month’s worth of food,” said Joyce Rothermel, Executive Director of the Food Bank.

      Many people think that food banks are completely privately funded, but actually a good deal of their funding come from government tax monies.

      During the current fiscal year, the State Food Purchase Program – created when the mills shut down in the 80’s --provides $17.4 million to buy quality food to supplement other inventories collected by pantries and cupboards through community food drives and business donations. Under the Governor’s proposal, funding would be slashed to $15 million next year despite the fact that the number of households in need is up across the state.

      Rendell also plans to cut back on many of the Medicaid services low-income people enjoy, although he expects new people to join the rolls and proposes increasing funding. Medical expense is the single largest influence driving up the state’s costs.

      In addition, the welfare reserves in the state have been depleted and a number of non-welfare funded programs, like child welfare, are slated to take major hits.

      Of course, levying taxes on the wealthy or on non-taxed corporations is off the table.

      As long as the federal government continues to cut back on grants to the states, and officials at the state and federal levels avoid revamping the revenue side of their operations (taxes) and their spending priorities, poor people will continue to suffer.

      Gov. Rendell Revives Food and Nutrition Council at Request of Advocates

      The Governor’s Inter-Agency Council on Food and Nutrition, which Gov. Casey established in 1988 and Gov. Ridge disbanded in 1994, is set to re-convene soon.

      This represents a great victory for advocacy organizations like Pennsylvania Hunger Action and Just Harvest, who asked Governor Rendell to revive the Council. The Departments of Agriculture, Welfare, Education, Health, Aging and Community and Economic Development are members.

      The council will work to alleviate hunger and poverty and to design and implement plans for improving Pennsylvanians’ nutritional status. Rendell’s office has asked the Department of Agriculture chair the council and provide staff service. Agriculture Secretary Dennis Wolff will act as Secretary. Rendell has included funding for the council in his proposed budget.

      Hard Work by State Hunger Group Brings One-of-a-Kind Federal Program to PA

      Pennsylvania Hunger Action Center staffer Sue Mitchem is traveling the entire state meeting with people in rural communities about offering the Summer Food Program. The program resulted from intensive advocacy the Center did with Congressman Platts and Senators Specter and Santorum. Twenty-five hundred more children will have access to summer meals through this one-of- a-kind pilot program that could bring us up to $75,000 in new federal funding.

      The Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) has been selected by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as the only pilot program in the nation aimed at increasing rural participation in the Summer Food Service Program, which provides meals for children from low-income families during the summer months. PDE estimates that 101 new school districts will now qualify.

      Regions of 21 rural counties are eligible for the pilot and any school district, non-profit and/or government organization in these counties may apply to participate in the Summer Food Service Program. For more information call 1-800-331-0129.

      Back to TOP

      NEWS BRIEFS

      Will you need Food Stamps?

      A study by Mark R. Rank and Thomas A. Hirschl shows that 51% of Americans between age 20 and 65 years old—4 out of ten Americans -- will participate in the Food Stamp Program at some point in their life. The study measures food stamp participation in the US and shows that the need for food stamps is not something that happens to “someone else.” In fact, two thirds of Americans will experience at least one year of poverty and at least half of the American population will need to use food stamps to get by. The study's results appeared in the December 2004 issue of the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior.

      One Million People in PA on Food Stamps!

      Advocates across the state conducting outreach for the Food Stamp Program have much to celebrate! (Or should we cry?) In December 2004 the total number of people receiving food stamps in Pennsylvania rose to 1,007,439, up from 996,684 in November. In January the number rose to 1,021,501 – an increase of 14,000 in just one month and the highest number in more than seven years! This marks the first time since 1997 (welfare reform) that more than one million Pennsylvanians were on food stamps. In fact, the number of Pennsylvanians participating in the program increased more than 20% over the last four years, reversing the drastic decline in participation in the program which had resulted from misunderstood welfare reform rules.

      Do We Know Who Controls Our Seeds?

      Monsanto, manufacturer and distributor of agricultural chemicals and developer of plant biotechnology has purchased Seminis, the largest fruit and vegetable producer in the world.

      Monsanto and Dupont already control about 60% of the domestic market for corn and soybean. Now Monsanto plans to acquire the company and breed the seeds conventionally. No biotech yet, they say. Despite this, it is doubtful Monsanto is retreating from the biotech frontier.

      What this means is you and I, not to mention the farmer, will have less choice over what we eat and grow as Monsanto’s grip on the seed supply tightens. And, if the labeling issue in the US is any indication, we will be less informed as a result. There can be no freer consumer choice when one company controls so much of the seed, and, by extension, when so few companies own so much.

      Back to TOP

      Pennsylvania Loses Three Important Leaders

      Pennsylvania lost three leaders in the war on hunger and poverty in the first months of 2005. William Schofield III, John McClay II and Louise Brookins touched the lives of many of the state’s poor and we mourn their passing.

      Bill Schofield died on January 24 t the age of 78. He served in the Navy during World War II and the Korean War and retired a group commander for reserve activities in 1972. In addition to his career as an insurance executive, Schofield also served as Veterans’ Affairs Director for Allegheny County, where he was a strong advocate for homeless vets. He met regularly with representatives from other county agencies and was an outspoken agent for change in local planning on hunger and poverty issues.

      John McClay II, 71, passed away on January 30. McClay was Chief Executive Officer of McClay, Inc, a food sales and marketing firm that he and his father co-founded. He cared deeply about the less fortunate, as demonstrated by his dedication to the United Way of Allegheny County and the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank; he served on the boards of both organizations for many years. He chaired Mayor Masloff’s Food Policy Commission in the '90's, which was initiated by Just Harvest.

      Louise Brookins, Executive Director of the Philadelphia Welfare Rights Organization for over 30 years, died on Saturday, February 6 at the age of 80. Brookins began caring for the poor in 1968 when she trained with Volunteers In Service To America (VISTA) in Washington. Later, she founded Philadelphia’s first VISTA office. Then, in 1972 she was appointed to the position she held until the time of her passing. Brookins was an outspoken advocate all her life.

      Back to TOP

      Victory In Promotion of the Food Stamp Program In Allegheny County!

      Advocates nationwide pushed to get media promotion of the Food Stamp Program as part of the federal outreach campaign. Initially, the Food & Nutrition Service of the USDA producing the campaign did not select Allegheny County for their 2005 radio campaign. However, thanks to Mike Mullen of Congressman Mike Doyle’s office, the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank, and Just Harvest, Allegheny County has been added to the campaign. The radio ads will occur in April and May, and again in the summer. A local committee of community people will work to ensure that FNS will publicize the correct information to the right people.

      Back to TOP

      What’s for Lunch?

      School districts all over the country are struggling to provide attractive, nutritious foods that are reimbursable by the federal government. In some districts “a la carte” items (not reimbursable for nutrition reasons) represent upwards of about 43 %of total school food sales.

      According to PANA (Pennsylvania Advocates for Nutrition and Activity) 35% of Pennsylvania’s children (higher than the national average of 30%) are overweight or at risk for becoming overweight although studies show no evidence that school meals participation contributes to obesity. New federal law requires that by 2006 all schools receiving federal money for meal programs must form “student health councils” to improve health and nutrition in their district. And new Pennsylvania law, starting next school year, requires that all Pennsylvania schools must measure students’ body-fat percentages and report them to parents.

      So how do you get students to choose healthier foods?

      Schools have become very creative in the ways they market healthy foods to our children. Center Area High School (Pennsylvania) held a Healthy Food Fair where children could try healthier foods for main courses, snacks, drinks and desserts that have more nutritional value than most a la carte items sold in schools. Children voted on their favorites, which will be implemented into the district’s menu which will also publish nutritional breakdowns.

      Back to TOP

      Major Changes in Store for Welfare Recipients
      Talk to Your Congressperson Now!

      Welfare reauthorization is finally moving! Senate leaders are working on a bi-partisan TANF bill (cash assistance) which is slated to move in the Senate Finance Committee the week of March 7.

      The foundation for this bill is the Republican PRIDE bill from last year. Last year when advocates pressed for additional child care money the Finance Committee added a $6 million for child care, but it was never voted on the floor. This year child care is still a key issue, and there are more Republicans in Congress now than last year.

      Some Republican members continue to insist that new money in human service programs must come from other social programs. They are not even considering the huge tax cuts for the wealthy or the extensive military spending as sources for these revenues. Some members want to raid programs like the Earned Income Tax Credits (EITC) to fund additional child care. Advocates have registered a resounding NO to this idea.

      The Senators are anxious to reach an agreement on a reauthorization bill so that TANF does not get caught up in the current budget process as part of a budget-cutting reconciliation bill.

      In the House, the Republican leadership has re-introduced last year’s punitive bill. The Ways and Means Committee (which includes Reps. Hart and Murphy) has not scheduled action yet. There is also a Democrat bill.

      Because the current TANF extension expires March 31, reauthorization will not be completed by then and Congress will probably pass another six-month “clean” extension.

      ACTION: Contact your Congressperson and Senators NOW about TANF Reauthorization. Tell them:

      • Don't use other low-income programs to offset increased childcare dollars
      • Don’t increases work requirements for TANF clients.
      • Don’t include TANF in any budget reconciliation
      • Increase Education and Training to 24 months (federal law allows only 12, now)

      Back to TOP

      Your generosity starts 2005 with a bang!

      We are so grateful for the generosity of our many, many supporters as we started the new year. Just Harvest Education Fund is pleased to acknowledge recent grants from Allegheny County, Share Our Strength for general support from the 2004 Taste of the Nation and from its Great American Bake Sale for our summer food campaign, the United Jewish Federation’s Urban Affairs Foundation for the Give Paychecks a Boost Campaign.

      Thank you to all our recent supporters, including: Anonymous, Dwelling House Savings & Loan, Evangelical Church Of The Redeemer, Oakmont United Methodist Women, Penn Hills Service Association, Sheriff Pete Defazio, Religious Society Of Friends, Rodef Shalom Congregation, Single Source Benefits, Bruce Antonoff, Edward & Cindy Asner, Lt. Gov. Catherine Baker Knoll, Esther Barazzone, Loretta Barone, Thomas & Gladys Benedek, Dan & Carol Berger, Ron Berlin, Fran Bertonaschi, Aya Betensky & Robert Kraut, Mark & Patricia Bibro, Beverly Biele, Edith Blattner, Donald Blinn, Georgia Blotzer, Glenrose Bradford, Donna & Edward Brett, George Brownell, David Caldwell, Stephen & Jean Carr, Susan Chapek & David Ball, Harold & Joan Chelemer, Rosemary Coffey, Dan & Clare Cornell, William Coyne, Darla Cravotta & David Weber, Emily DeFerrari & Mel Packer, Thomas & Marilyn Donnelly, Christiane & Don Dutton, Mary Edmonds, Frederick Egler, Jr. & Kathleen Buechel in honor of Fred & Ruth Egler, Robert & Judith Eurich, Alexander Federowicz & Margaret Laske, Ed Feinstein & Sally Kalson, William Finch, Muriel Floyd, Glenn Freund, David & Joan Gauthier, Mary Gilligan, Linda Gimbrone, Alexandra Gruskos, Robert Hadad, William Hashinger & Joan Isenberg, Eva Havlicsek, Anne Hawkins, Mark Heine & Helene Bender, Henry & Elsie Hillman, Thomas Hoffman & Janet Catov, Roberta Horwitz, Ivan Itkin, Eileen Jardini, Annabelle & Jay Joseph, Jean Kablack in memory of Shirley Nusser, Mary Ann Kellers, Amy Kellman, Chandler & Louise Ketchum, Elizabeth Klimchock, Kerry Knight in honor of Mike Stout, Daniel Kovalik & Christine Haas, David Krupp, Marc Levine, Richard & Susan Loether,Randy & Charlotte Lott, Cherie & Stanley Maharam, Louise & Michael Malakoff, Jason & Beverly Manne, Audrey Maretzki, Mary Elizabeth McCarthy, Melanie & Art McDonald, Patricia McElligot, Howard & Shirley McIlvried, Denny & Marjie McManus, Cynthia McNulty, Jeanne McNutt, Gregory Meitus, Cheryl Morden, Barbara Murock & Carl Fertman, Deborah Murtagh, Julia Nagle, Joann Narduzzi, Bob & Liane Norman, Marianne Novy, Pam & Dick Oestreicher, Rae Ellen O’Hair, Tom & Barbara Onieal, David Orenstein & Alexandra Gruskos, Jack & Mary Paradise, David & Shelly Parker, James & Catherine Parker, Harold & Ann Paxton, Lucille Perlman in honor of Joni Rabinowitz, Frank Perrino, Charles Peters, Jeff & Terry Peters, Phil & Rhonda Peters, Suzanne Polen, Connie Portis, Joni Rabinowitz, Marcus Rediker & Wendy Goldman, Caroline Roberto, Gayle Rosner Abrams, Matthew Rosser, Jim Ruck & Gail Britanik, Ann Ruszkowski, Edward Ruszkowski, Lorraine Sauchin, Rocky Schoen & Nancy Bernstein, David & Elizabeth Segel, Mim Seidel & David Blaushild, Steve & Dot Shreve, Ed & Dorothy Sites, Gerald & Paula Sokolow, Marjorie Spenser, Suzanne Steidl, John Stember, Richard & Katherine St. John, Judge Gene Strassburger & Phyllis Kitzerow, Ruth Succop, Lowell & Rachel Swarts, Sandra Swetland, Jean Szoch, Peter Tanzer, Vell Truehart, Cynthia Vanda, Ned & Karen Vanderven, Lorraine Vinograd, Milan Vranish, Charles & Janet Vukotich, David & Leigh-Anne Weiss, Elissa Weiss, Nancy Welfer, William Whitaker, Gina Wilson, Sylvia Wilson, Elizabeth Wolfskill, and Diane Wuycheck.

      Back to TOP

      ANNOUNCEMENTS

      HAVE A PARTY & SPREAD THE WORD

      Can you help get the word out about Just Harvest by inviting friends and neighbors over?

      You can host a house party or organize a get together to reach out to new people and build support for the fight against hunger and poverty.

      Elegant or casual, whatever suits your style.Its easy, fun, and helps a great cause.

      Call Ken at Just Harvest office at 412-431-8960 to sign up.

      WELLSTONE!”


      a film by Hard Working Pictures

      “A must see for anyone interested in creating positive change” - BuzzFlash.com

      One night only Benefit Screening

      Join Just Harvest for the premiere Pittsburgh screening of this engrossing film.

      WELLSTONE! is a feature length documentary about a remarkable man who defied tradition and returned politics to people. Like Paul Wellstone, the film is smart, funny and full of surprises.

      Friday, April 22
      Reception 6 pm- $15 RSVP
      Film showing 7 pm donation requested

      Eddy Theatre,
      Chatham College next to the Library
      Parking instructions

      Co-Sponsored by the Chatham College Center for Women and Politics

      Just Harvest now accepts credit cards and checks online!

      To make a donation, purchase terrific Just Harvest merchandise or buy tickets for our next event, just log on to our website at www.justharvest.org and follow the links from our main page.

      Back to TOP

      Nuts and Bolts
      What is Budget Reconciliation and Why Should You Care?

      Every few years Congress uses the “reconciliation” procedure to move legislation on a fast track and make cuts in entitlements. (Entitlement programs provide benefits to everyone who meets certain criteria.) Discretionary programs, on the other hand, are subject to annual appropriations. and not affected by Reconciliation. Here is how reconciliation works and how it can hurt vulnerable populations.

      The budget resolution, passed in the spring, is usually simply a blueprint that sets limits on taxes or program costs. But sometimes the budget includes additional rules, known as “reconciliation instructions” that tell specific committees how much they must cut over a five or ten year period and give a deadline for the committees to create legislation containing these cuts.

      If the House and Senate agree to include reconciliation instructions this year, the affected committees must then produce their parts of a reconciliation bill, which requires a yes or no vote from the House and Senate and then goes to the President for his signature. Debate and opportunity for amendment are very limited.

      Here is why the reconciliation process is so dangerous:

      • Reconciliation instructions are binding and cannot be ignored. There are very few ways to force Congress to take action, but this is one of them. With the exception of once, every single time in the last 25 years a final budget resolution has included reconciliation instructions to cut spending, Congress has followed these instructions.
      • A reconciliation bill on the Senate floor and requires only 51 votes to pass. There are 55 Republications in the Senate and Vice President Cheney can break a tie. So even if 5 Republicans and all Democrats oppose the reconciliation bill, it can still pass.
      • Constituencies and programs get pitted against each other. Once a committee gets assigned a dollar amount to cut, its only choice is how to spread around the pain. For instance, if the Agriculture committee is told to cut $10 billion, will it cut cotton subsidies or food stamp benefits?
      • Many controversial provisions that would not pass on their own get packaged together and it’s difficult to amend the bill on the floor.

      The Appropriations committee is the only committee with the power to spend money that is NOT affected by reconciliation, This committee is responsible for annual appropriations for discretionary programs.

      We must stop any budget which has reconciliation instructions.

      Below are the committees potentially affected by reconciliation instructions, and a few major programs in their jurisdiction(partial): Senate Finance/House Ways and Means

      -TANF
      -Medicaid (Senate only)
      -Medicare
      -Child Care
      -EITC
      -SSI
      -Unemployment Insurance

      Agriculture
      -Crop Subsidies
      - Food Stamps
      -Child Nutrition (Senate Only)

      Veterans Affairs
      - Veterans Affairs

      Armed Services
      - Military Retirement

      Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions(HELP)/House Education & the Workforce
      -child nutrition (House only)

      Thanks to Center for Community Change www.communitychange.org for the bulk of this article.

      Back to TOP


  • About Us | What We Do | Publications | Hunger & Poverty | How You Can Help | Take Action | Home